Sprinting has grown immensely. The first winner of the Olympics did not run faster than 12.0 hand-time.
Four years later at the 1900 Olympics, two men have equaled the world record of 10.8 (hand-timed), which they achieved during the heats.
Both the winners of the 1932 and 1936 Olympics have recorded 10.3h.
In the 1960s, 10.3 hand-timed in men's 100m means you are world-class.
In the 1960s and 1970s, if you wish to run the 100m in less than 10s, altitude was a must. The idea was deemed very crucially during that time. Hence, a good selection of racing venues would be necessary.
Ben Johnson won a 100m bronze in the 1984 Olympics with a time of 10.24s. What is a 10.24s at present?
In the 1990s 10.1 electric means world-class.
Actually, you won't find so many athletes who could achieve a sub-10.10, and if you did, these athletes must be well renowned already.
To run the 100m in 2000 Olympics, you would just need a 10.38s result. Before the year 2000s, there were only 20+ sprinters who have run sub-10s.
As indicated in the All-Time best for the 100m as of 2003, there were less than 40 sprinters who have done sub-10s.
Ten years later on the lists, more than 100 sprinters listed to have broken the 10s barrier.
Asafa Powell alone has totaled more than 100 races in under 10s.
Bolt, Gay, Blake, Powell, Gatlin have run 9.58, 9.69, 9.69, 9.72, and 9.74s, respectively.
A 10.12s is the current Olympic and Worlds standard.
I was tempted to "document" the trend of changes through the years that might be relevant to this evolution. Here we go.
Before the 1980's - Complete genetics
- Most sprinters in the past were "born sprinters", which means they would rely upon the genetics for their successes.
- The various limitations and limited high-performance culture did not allow them to train under the most effective environment and system that are available today.
- Some athletes did benefit from better coaching from the great coaches in the past.
1980s - Strength and muscles
- Because of the understanding that muscles that you would build could help generate higher force and power.
- The use of steroid facilitated this practice.
- "To run fast in sprints, you must develop muscles" (kind of mindset).
- Anyone running sub-10s was linked to steroids.
1990s - Strength and power
- Some good coaches started to realize it is the ability to maximize power output that matters than how much strength you have.
- A combination of muscles (strength) and power was thought to be essential.
- Lack of understanding regarding the environment factor, that bigger athlete can deal better whenever the race is against the winds (headwinds).
- Many people confused between strength and power during these days (unable to differentiate).
- To break 10s in the 100m, you must develop muscles (kind of mindset).
- 9.90 seconds was the limit of human performance, otherwise steroid (kind of mindset).
The early 2000s - Power
- It was thought that fast turnover or cadence of legs is more crucial than having big muscles.
- Tim Montgomery who broke WR in 9.78s in 2002, helped "confirmed" this belief.
- Human now can run sub-9.85 but it must be under a highly favorable condition, otherwise, that must be associated with steroids (kind of mindset)
The late 2000s - Rate of force development
- People started to think more critically, it is how much force you can produce in a short amount of time that could help you to run faster.
- Sprinters in these days are generally not bigger in muscle sizing than those in the 1990s and 1980s.
2010s - Orientation of the force application
- Marginal gains sort of thing - small things that can make a difference.
- It's not only force and power, but it is how do you use it to make you a better sprinter.
- The technique of force application can determine how properly and effectively the body can be propelled forward.
- Efficiency in terms of using your "fuel" (strength and power) to "drive" quicker and faster.
Read more...