Periodization or Training Programming for Sports

>> September 06, 2011

There is only one training periodization, that is periodization. But there are different approaches or strategies for doing it. This is explained throughout the article.

Periodization can provide a framework in which the division of periods are well organized, and carried out in a systematic way. It should contain the variables which are ideally blended and sequenced.

Periodization can either be the energy system-specific, resistance training specific, or both altogether.

In order to achieve a desired goal of training, a well-plan training structure and programme is vital. This should first be seen from the perspective of objective or aim of training itself.

You need to set goals and define your period or phases that will help you as the driving vehicle to accomplish your goals. You can then realize it with a good periodization, or more accurately training programming.

You can argue there is a multitude type of periodization. The hard fact is that it is still periodization, as already stated. The way you apply the training variables does not make a different name. You will periodize your training based on what works best for you.

What makes the organization of training successful lies on how a good manipulation (i.e. programming) of the essential training variables, such as volume, load, density, set, rep, and so on, and this is specifically called as training programming.

The term has been comprehensively discussed by top strength/power scientists such as Michael H. Stone in his famous textbook.

Training programming can be manipulated in order to achieve certain fitness goals. It means you can play around with training variables to see what is best for your athlete(s) and this is done from time to time.

In research, various strategies in programming have been debated and discussed. For some reasons, some authors claimed one strategy is superior to others. In my opinion, they might be right, however, it is also the nature of programming, in which you need to develop one or try another one to get better over time.

Just like the principle of progression, you can't stick to the same stimulus over time, if you want to progress. If you do want to progress, appropriate manipulation of the variables should be necessary.

There are, however, a few things that I think one should note in regards to programming.  Understanding about stimulus and response is crucial in training programming.

This is a prerequisite as only an appropriate balance of training that can lead to better management of fatigue (physical/mental exhaustion) and potentiation (increment), and even to the extent of understanding the potential of overreaching and to be able to use it in order to get better. This will help you to make good progress. Here, appropriate adjustment to the training variables is sought, and this will bring you back to the concept of training variation such as loading manipulation.

Training variation is the tenet of all training programming relating to manipulating and sequencing the variables. It is also the fundamental of training stimulus that is required to attain higher training goals.

Therefore, several models or methods of periodization (training programming) are utilized, researched, and discussed. It's called "method" because it depicts the structure or how an aspect of design (using training variables) is presented. They are a. sequential, b. concurrent, and will be discussed further.

What makes one different from another?
Again, there is only one periodization and its called periodization. However, if you want to look it from "training focus" point of view, such as the training variation, and primarily the loading concentration and sequence, you will find that some methods are "sequential" or "linear" and some others are "concurrent", but these are usually in cyclic fashion, so what is that means? "non linear".

So it is difficult to segregate this but the application of one method or model will also depend on the athlete's needs and competition demands. Someone who is new to a planned training may utilize the sequential method or even the concurrent one, and both require an appropriate adjustment of training variables. An athlete who is several years into performance training may utilize any one of the methods. The more advanced the training the higher the volume or difficulty of training. Examples of training are as described:

1. Sequential (traditional or/and linear).
This method may be applied based on the athlete's training experience and level, as discussed.

Beginner and intermediate
This method comprises several training periods or blocks that follow one another. For example, phase 1 (general preparation - hypertrophy), phase 2 (specific preparation - max strength), and phase 3 (competition - power), and apply this concept this way: decreasing in volume, increasing in the intensity. This kind of programming may be more suitable for a new or young athlete.

The earlier practice of this method (called Classical Periodization Theory (CPT)) required the development of motor abilities and skills simultaneously, applied in a prolonged duration to target only one main competition (although it was expanded since then, i.e. 2-3 major competitions).

It involved a moderate-low concentration of training load throughout the period as it was said difficult to perform higher loads when multiple qualities are being the focus at one time. This is repeated in a cyclic manner over the years. Therefore, the CPT is 'not linear'.

Intermediate or advanced
The sequential method can also be manipulated to suit the 'needs' of advanced athletes by linking a sequence of concentrated load periods. The block system of training follows this organization.

This can be easily understood with the following example: a. accumulation (preparation), b. transmutation (max strength), c. realization (speed-strength).

Block periodization considers a unidirectional approach, in which only one quality is emphasized (primarily) at a time (per period) while maintaining the others. For example, power development:
  • Period 1: strength (emphasis), plus strength-speed, speed-strength; 
  • Period 2: strength-speed (emphasis), plus strength, speed-strength; 
  • Period 3: speed-strength (emphasis), plus strength, strength-speed. 
OR
  • Accumulation (4 weeks): high volume and low-moderate intensity: strength endurance, 4 sets x 12-15 reps x 55-65% => 2-3 sessions a week (+ max-strength + speed-strength => 1 session as "easy session").
  • Transmutation (4 weeks): lower volume and high intensity: maximal strength, 4 sets x 3-6 reps x 85-92% => 2-3 sessions a week (+ speed-strength + strength-endurance => 1 session  as "easy session").
  • Realization (3 weeks): low volume and lower-moderate intensity: speed-strength, 4 sets x 3-6 reps x 30-50% => 2-3 sessions a week (+ strength-speed => 1 session as "easy session" or incorporated in one of the speed-strength session).
This sequence is repeated (thus, the whole process is non-linear). The method is popularized by Vladimir Issurin from the early 1980s, influenced by the idea of the earlier method of programming (will be discussed).

The most important in block periodization is how one can benefit from the residual training effect, which means the effect of training that you have done in the previous month (accumulation) that required the implementation of a very concentrated load

In other words, the hard training you did in July- i.e. cumulative will benefit you in September- i.e. residual effect).

The premise of block periodization is the same as the Conjugate Sequence System (CSS) or coupled successive system (CSS) that was established by Yuri Verkhoshansky in the early 1970s as well as the Phase Potentiation Periodization (PPP) that was introduced by Michael Stone in late 1970s.

Block periodization, CSS, and PPP provide advantages over other methods. They can be confused with concurrent training because they do not totally neglect other qualities when emphasizing one quality (main focus, as discussed above) during a certain training block.

In addition, to understand the term better, "conjugate" (CSS) means "with others" (one or more other things together). But because the training emphasis is programmed in a sequential manner during a particular block or period, and not concurrent manner, it is, therefore, a "linear" method for this perspective.

2. Concurrent (undulating or non-linear)
In this method, two or more training qualities are trained on a daily or weekly basis. The weekly concurrent or undulating training can be depicted as follow (considered one training period or block):
  • Week 1: training for hypertrophy, 4 sets x 8-10 reps x 70-80%
  • Week 2: strength, 4 sets x 4-6 reps x 85-90%
  • Week 3: power, 4 sets x 3-6 reps x 40-60%
The daily undulating method is as follows (repeated for several weeks to form a training period or block):
  • Monday = hypertrophy
  • Wednesday = strength
  • Friday = power. 
Another form of the concurrent method is the model of programming the training called concurrent emphasis. This is also an example of CPT and is deemed concurrent method because it is originally applied in a way that develops all the qualities simultaneously.

For example, strength endurance, strength-speed, and speed-strength training are all emphasized and developed simultaneously in a certain training period, and this has been discussed earlier. 

Which one is most effective?
This is probably a question when one wishes to develop a training programme. All the models that have been discussed are important and effective. It is how you use and incorporate them into your programme. It is not surprising if you see a coach incorporates two or more methods in his/her training during a season. 

However, there is always a principle for anything. If you are a newbie and given 3 gym sessions in a week, you can do whatever you want in all the training days in fact during the whole first month, means your emphasis should be on lifting skills or technique while you also develop general strength. Later you can try to programme your workout using the non-linear, or the undulating method, just to get you motivated by the variation of training. 

For team sports, a mix of linear (early season, no competition) and non-linear (subsequently, with/during competition) might be more ideal. The same for most individual events/sports.

In elite athletes, there is always the need to apply the more advanced method as they need the additional stimulus in order to get better. 

The difference between the "less-advanced" and advanced methods is concerned primarily with loading scheme and distribution.

Post a Comment

ASIAN LEADERS (Men)

100m 9.91 Su Bingtian CHN, Madrid
200m 20.16 Xie Zhenye CHN, Osaka
400m 44.07 Abdalelah Haroun QAT, London
800m 1:45.65 Jinson Johnson IND, Guwahati
1500m 3:34.55 Sadik Mikhou BRN, Paris
5000m 13:01.09 Birhanu Yemataw BRN, Lausanne
10000m 27:38.16 Hassan Chani BRN, Maia
Mar 2:06.11 Yuta Shitara JPN, Tokyo
3000 Sc 8:22.00 Kosei Yamaguchi JPN, Abashiri
110mh 13.36 Ahmad Al-Mouaed KSA, Praha
400mh 46.98 Abderrahman Samba QAT, Paris
HJ 2.40 Mutaz Barshim QAT, Doha
PV 5.71 Xue Changrui CHN, Shanghai
LJ 8.47A Wang Jianan CHN, Guiyang
TJ 17.22 Dong Bin CHN, Eugene OR
SP 20.24 Tejinder Singh IND, Patiala
DT 68.85 Ehsan Hadidi IRI, Chula Vista CA
HT 78.18 Dilshod Nazarov TJK, Chorzow
JT 87.43 Neeraj Chopra IND, Doha
Dec 7948 Keisuke Ushiro JPN, Gotzis
20kmW 1:17:26 Eiki Takahashi JPN, Kobe
50kmW 3:44:25 Hiroki Arai JPN, Taichang
4x100m 37.85 Japan Team JPN, Osaka
4x400m 3:04.05 India Team IND, Gold Coast
RED = World Leader

STATISTICS

STATISTICS

ASIAN LEADERS (Women)

100m 10.99 Wei Yongli CHN, Resisprint
200m 22.73 Viktoriya Zyabkina KAZ, Almaty
400m 49.08 Salwa Eid Naser BRN, Monaco
800m 2:02.23 Manal Bahraoui BRN, Duffel
1500m 4:11.55 P.U Chitra IND, Guwahati
5000m 15:10.91 Rina Nabeshima JPN, Eugene OR
10000m 31:52.42 Mizuki Matsuda JPN, Yamaguchi
Mar 2:22.44 Mizuki Matsuda JPN, Osaka
3000 Sc 9:10.74 Winfred Yavi BRN, Monaco
100mh 13.08 Wu Shuijiao CHN, Shanghai
400mh 55.54 Aminat Odeyemi BRN, Goleniow
HJ 1.91 Nadzehda Dusanova UZB, Tashkent
PV 4.60 Li Ling CHN, London
LJ 6.64A Xu Xiaoling CHN, Guiyang
TJ 14.25 Olga Rypakova KAZ, Paris
SP 20.38A Gong Lijiao CHN, Guiyang
DT 67.03 Chen Yang CHN, Osterode
HT 75.02 Luo Na CHN, Halle
JT 67.69 Lu Huihui CHN, Halle
Hep 5898 Purnima Hembram IND, Guwahati
20kmW 1:26:28 Qieyang Shenjie CHN, La Coruna

Statistics


ARCHIVES

Copyright © 2009-2018, AdrianSprints.com . All Rights Reserved . Policy . Term of Use
Sports Top Blogs Sports blogs & blog posts Free Web Stats

Back to TOP